Would you mind sharing what are these “first user reports” that are “worse than what [you] expected”?
I've gathered feedback from various sources including a Porsche dealer, Porsche forums, general e-mobility debates, and this forum. Here are my thoughts:
Range and "Range Anxiety"
Range "anxiety" feels like a misleading term; it is more about range reality. Anxiety suggests there’s nothing to worry about, but in this case, it’s grounded in reality. German eMacan owners report ranges between 280 and 350 km (175 - 220 miles), significantly lower than Porsche's claim of "almost 400 miles". Forum users argue that achieving the advertised range would require ideal conditions—no air resistance, perfect temperatures (no lower than 20°C/68°F), no rain, no snow, and smooth road conditions. Real-world (RW) range, from various accounts, is roughly 50-60% of Porsche's claimed range.
This discrepancy is further exacerbated by regulations forcing manufacturers to report realistic ranges and consumption for ICE cars, while EV ranges appear significantly overestimated.
Residual Value
Porsche’s strength lies in its reliability and strong residual values, even for non-classic models like the Macan and Cayenne. However, this doesn't translate well in the EV world. No matter the build quality, EVs tend to lose value rapidly as newer, improved models emerge—similar to iPhones. If the battery is damaged, the car could be a total economic loss with no viable second-hand market, making ownership financially impossible. Leasing may mitigate some depreciation, but it isn’t fundamentally different from shouldering heavy depreciation plus interest.
Charging Infrastructure
While I believe the charging infrastructure will eventually meet demand, there remain security concerns. The idea of waiting 30-40 minutes at a remote charger on a dark, winter night is troubling. I've personally witnessed a young woman charging her Tesla in such conditions, and it struck me as unsafe.
Primary Vehicle Suitability
Our Macan serves as our primary vehicle, a role an EV cannot currently fulfill for us. A secondary, city-vehicle could be electric, but this doesn’t fully mitigate the concerns mentioned above.
Weight and Handling
The eMacan is notably heavier, weighing half a ton more than the ICE GTS. Users report that the driving experience feels artificial due to the constant intervention of stabilization systems, reducing the driver's connection to the road. Auto Motor Sport magazine describes it as "driving on rails," contrasting sharply with the more direct feel of the ICE version.
Software readiness
I saw a dozen or more Macans lined up at my dealer, preparing for delivery. However, it took them days to upload the final versions of software to be ready. This will be fixed eventually, but it looked like one of the key elements of an EV was highly unfit and required updating until the buyer takes the key (and afterwards...).
Trip Planning
The need to plan routes, charging points, and ranges for trips longer than 180 miles is not an attractive "lifestyle" feature to me. While your smartphone can assist, I don’t want to manage such logistics. Currently, I don't have to, so promoting this capability as a benefit of EVs doesn’t make me feel it's an advantage.
These are my personal views. Of course, there are many users who love their eMacans and don't mind the electric car conditions and limitations. Good luck to them. However, I am not ready yet under the current conditions. Governments, by forcing the industry into immature tech, have removed choices. This approach might not work out, and there are millions of jobs at stake.