Joined
·
244 Posts
Lucky! All the options I wanted were not standard in the Turbo, and even some that are straight up NOT included. For example, the side blades, I really like the contrast, in the Turbo you gotta pay for the carbon fiber. so I think my turbo build would have ended up costing more than the initial 22k premium. If it had been under 10k like yours, it would have been turbo all the way.My Turbo was almost $90k, and a comparable loaded S would have cost me low 80's, about 8k less. When spending this kind of money the last thing I wanted was buyers remorse for not stepping up to the Turbo, especially when the delta (for me) was ~10%. I know myself, I felt and heard the difference between the two cars and I would have regrets and be trading up in less than one year. Others on this forum have already reported the same regret.
It also comes down to your expectations for the car, and what will satisfy you. I have owned many high performance cars and for me, the S would simply not be enough power to keep me happy. For each his own as they say, but be sure to measure thrice and cut once
Sent from AutoGuide.com Free App