It is a big car running with a tiny engine... high consumption shouldn't be unexpected.
It is a big car running with a tiny engine... high consumption shouldn't be unexpected.I'm still mad that the Macan 2.0 only gets 19mpg though
As my dad used to say: if you can't find something wrong with somebody you just don't know them well enough!It’s like 2 people who look alike, until you get to know them…..![]()
My wife and I are DRIVERS....we love to jump into a car and just take off somewhere. No need to have a destination or chore that needs to get done. As a result, the only SUV we approached was a 2022 GTS....didn't even bother to look at Audi, BMW, or Merc. Porsche knows how to build a driver's car better than anyone else IMO. yea it does not have Android connectivity, and the driver's info center is too outdated for some people's taste. Those are all minor annoyance's to me. We have had 3 Porsches: Cayenne S, Boxster S, and 911 4S, and they all had true driver's elements in common. Incredible steering feel, wonderfully sorted chassis, great sounds, and plenty of power to get you to the next corner quickly...I spent some time at the AudiWorld forum a few months ago. I was kicking tires on an S5 or an SQ5. More than a few threads there bad-mouthing the Macan as "old" technology (not entirely wrong) on an "old" platform (nothing wrong with it). Can a CUV be a driver's car? Open to debate but no matter your answer we can probably agree the SQ5 is not one. And the iPad-style control interface is a design aesthetic that will not age well IMO. So I ended up here, helped along by my previous experience owning 911s and an enabling wife.
TL/DR: CNET is right, it's a boring car (at least to me).
Audi does have one strength here. They have lease programs for the person who leases cars will find the pricing attractive . In the pricing comparison it was the only thing that mentioned.CNET review
I figured I'd read this review of a car that is quite closely related to the Macan, but gives you 349 hp from a 3.0V6 for $60,000 while I paid that much for the engine that even Audi puts in its base models.
Then I read this: "It's got a turbocharged 3.0-liter V6 producing 349 horsepower and 369 pound-feet, with Audi saying the SQ5 will hit 60 mph in 4.7 seconds, but it doesn't feel that quick. It sounds boring, too, especially when pitted against competitors from BMW and Mercedes-AMG. The ride quality is fantastic and the cabin is nice and quiet at highway speeds, but the SQ5's steering is too numb and light for my liking. All in, my test car comes to $74,240. That's a whole lot of money for a crossover that just doesn't feel special or different enough to justify its existence"
And I agree-- I love my 2.0 Macan for so many other reasons than just a hp/$ ratio. Reasons I see and feel everyday, every ride. Styling, handling, the brand, lighting, interior feels, etc.
I'm still mad that the Macan 2.0 only gets 19mpg though.
I have a '21 MB GLA 45 AMG with 8 speed dual clutch. I've had 3 Macan's with PDK. Yep, I'll go with 'telepathic' for the PDK, especially for low speed around town driving.I had a S5, and when I found out the next gen was getting a ZF 8, I was immediately turned off. I love dual clutch so that’s what brought me to Porsche. After I took one drive in the Macan vs the SQ5 and S5 Sportback, I knew. PDK is telepathic.
I drove the GV70 (Sport Edition) and a Macan literally back-to-back (The two dealerships are about a mile apart) same test circuit, same traffic, time of day etc.) The Genesis was very smooth and capable but, to my taste, a bit soft. It bests the Porsche in the "driver convenience" area and the camera system in the mirrors that puts an image of the camera view on the instrument panel when the turn signal is used is brilliant. The Porsche was also very smooth but, in addition, where the Genesis handled curves, lane changes etc. very very well, the Porsche conveyed a feeling of being literally "bolted" to the road and ready to respond to even unreasonable demands. Some of this may reflect the fact that while the Porsche uses multi link suspension on all 4 corners, the Genesis front suspension is McPherson strut which places some limitations on the geometry. (Also really did not like the Genesis "twist the knob" shifter)We recently test drove a 2021 Audi Q5 2.0T Tecknik (top line, with sport package, etc. ~$70k Canadian). It drove well enough, and is calm on the highway, but neither my wife nor I could get over how soft / uninspired the steering was. It was a deal-breaker.
We drove a Macan later that week, and hands down it was a much more engaging vehicle (even though on paper it looks near identical...). We didn't continue the search, and ordered a MY22 base Macan shortly thereafter. It should arrive in about a week.
I would be interested in the Genesis GV70, since it has been getting incredible reviews. Maybe I'll check one out closer as the Macan approaches the end of warranty-- 2022 Genesis GV70 Review, Pricing, and Specs
Thanks for your comments! I guess that's the reason the Macan has been substantially unchanged since 2015, while the "competition" makes major changes and/or creates new models to try to keep upI drove the GV70 (Sport Edition) and a Macan literally back-to-back (The two dealerships are about a mile apart) same test circuit, same traffic, time of day etc.) The Genesis was very smooth and capable but, to my taste, a bit soft. It bests the Porsche in the "driver convenience" area and the camera system in the mirrors that puts an image of the camera view on the instrument panel when the turn signal is used is brilliant. The Porsche was also very smooth but, in addition, where the Genesis handled curves, lane changes etc. very very well, the Porsche conveyed a feeling of being literally "bolted" to the road and ready to respond to even unreasonable demands. Some of this may reflect the fact that while the Porsche uses multi link suspension on all 4 corners, the Genesis front suspension is McPherson strut which places some limitations on the geometry. (Also really did not like the Genesis "twist the knob" shifter)
This is not even that new. I've seen this exact feature in a 2015 civic.the camera system in the mirrors that puts an image of the camera view on the instrument panel when the turn signal is used is brilliant.
But if it had all the toys, my GTS build would be over $100kThis is not even that new. I've seen this exact feature in a 2015 civic.
Sad that porsche is so slow to advance tech-wise and I don't like their trickle down strategy. I wish we had on the new macans the more digital 911 dash and console.