Even though The officer obtained the insurance info from the father, he has decided to pay directly w/o using his insurance. The father is communicating with me & with the Penske collision center via an employee (Accountant) at his company.
I would be more confident of eventual full payment, if I was dealing with the father's insurance company.
I checked with Penske collision & since no insurance is involved, no report sent to CarFax. So, assuming the bill gets paid, I will make no diminished value claim.
Earliest appt. I could get to bring in my car, to begin work, was February.
Penske requires a substantial payment, b4 they begin work.
I am still awaiting the written, preliminary estimate, based on my visit to Penske the day after the accident. This will also be sent to the father's accountant. Along with request for payment.
I was supposed to receive this today but, as of 6PM MST, I have not received it.
To the armchair lawyers commenting on specifics of AZ law.
Of course, the young woman complied with the spirit of the law.
Maybe the officer was mistaken in his insistence that AZ law requires the at fault driver to call police.
Of course, no prosecuter would prosecute the woman for not calling the police.
I am relieved (not grateful, not at all grateful) that my car was not damaged more, which might cause me to fix, sell & buy something else.
My life experience, along with several similar experiences, from friends & stories from friends of friends, is NOT positive re at fault drivers who promise to pay.
Off topic?
If I had extensive damage, what would I have seriously considered buying?
Possibly, a 2023 Macan GTS, even though I would have difficulty getting an allocation & even more trouble getting a discount & I dislike the rear taillight & the touch screens instead of buttons.
Also, I am unhappy with the Macan steering coulmn failure in < 40K miles. "And PCNA refusing Good Will."
So, I would seriously consider other brands.
Glad I do not have to deal with that decision now.