Porsche Macan Forum banner

I knew I should have gotten a Kia!

11817 Views 80 Replies 37 Participants Last post by  dmanthree
Maybe next time, I mean I'm sure Consumer Reports and me are looking at things in exactly the same way. Right. Sorry to bring the bad news.

  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: 2
41 - 60 of 81 Posts
Maybe next time, I mean I'm sure Consumer Reports and me are looking at things in exactly the same way. Right. Sorry to bring the bad news.

LMAO. Good for them. I never want to be with the masses.
The article is totally bogus, full of misleading statements and flawed conclusions.

First of all the claim the Sportage "killed" the Macan is hardly true. Funny how the author never mentions just how much lower the Sportage rating was.

Next, as a long term (several decades) CR subscriber, I'm fully aware one cannot compare scores from one automobile segment to another. The author obviously has no idea about this. What the author is suggesting would be like comparing the CR ratings for winter tires versus summer tires. The segments are just not comparable.

Finally, CR ratings are generally only useful as a screening tool at most because everyone has different priorities. The rating schemes are by necessity totally subjective because it's just impossible to be objective for the most part.

To really use CR (same with Car and Driver, Motor Trend etc.) ratings, one needs to dig into the data and place your own priorities on the rating factors based on what's important to you. For example, let's say CR gives one car more points because it has a roomier back seat. But if you never use your back seat, that's pretty much meaningless to you.

If I wanted to I could come up with a rating scheme that would rate a Yugo higher than a Macan.



.
Where CR ratings are meaningful is reliability. I participate yearly in their surveys and find them to be, well, reliable. This is something one never gets from the car mags as they rarely have long term experimce with a vehicle. For them, the cost of ownership is zero.

One can also count on CR for factual matters. A vehicle has a spare tire or not. A vehicle has ApplePlay or not. Beyond that, they are just another voice.

But if there were only one mag I’d read, it would be CR.

My favorite automotive writer is Dan Neil of the Wall St. Journal. But I’d never buy a car based on his reviews.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
you mean i could get a car with more space for less money?

It's been over a decade since I looked to CR for any advice. Their testing and advice reads like fluff.

As far as car reviews go, they jumped the shark with their histrionic review proclaiming the historic Tesla Model S the greatest car in the history of car history.
As far as car reviews go, they jumped the shark with their histrionic review proclaiming the historic Tesla Model S the greatest car in the history of car history.
That’s nothing but a blatant lie. Amazing how some people come on this forum and make totally ridiculous baseless claims.
I have to take the other side of the Suzuki Samurai viewpoint. I was in college when the Samurai was a new and popular car. It already had the tainted reputation when one of my good friends got one from his parents (hmm, now wait a minute...). We went off road a lot in that thing I every time we did I expected it to roll over but it never came close. And he drove that thing like it belonged to his ex wife's attorney.

Not saying they aren't less stable because you don't need many firing synapses to see it is tall with a high center of gravity, but easily prone to rolling? My opinion is that it wasn't more prone to rolling than any jeep type vehicle. And I say that as a guy who rolled an International Scout on a fairly straight road (being 17 and dumb) - which is why it was especially noteworthy to me when a couple of years later I was riding in that Samurai and it didn't. That friend put almost 200k miles on that thing, a lot of it delivering pizza in treacherous weather.
See less See more
I thought the CR article was amusing. Now, I have found some words of stupidity on another level all together. For your amusement I present the following:
I thought the CR article was amusing. Now, I have found some words of stupidity on another level all together. For your amusement I present the following:
This thing is a dog. I absolutely hate those transmissions that operate like a top.
lol.

Not too many jobs out there where you can get one with zero experience as a political favor.
Actually, we saw quite a few of those jobs the last several years. And in my personal experiences, people love to dump on scumbag personal injury lawyers until they or their loved ones are maimed. Then all bets are off.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
When I happened on this thread, my initial reaction was "how ironical" As it turns out, the content per se, essentially a referendum on CR, belied that but I do have several observations related to the title of this sub-forum.

First let me note that I am not a big CR fan. My experience over the years is that their information is believable/useful in inverse proportion to my own experience in the area - refrigerators, vacuum cleaners etc. where measurements can be made & reported, OK - audio systems, cars etc - not so much.

Over the past year I have posted a number of both questions and accounts of my thinking on several sub-forums here as part of a "new car" decision making process. Starting with 6 (then adding a 7th) possibility, I looked, learned and drove. Four of the candidates were similar in size th my current Volvo wagon: The Macan, MB GLC 300 coupe, Genesis GV70 and the Audi A5 hatch. Three were significantly larger - The Panamera, Audi A7 and, added because of its similarity in size, shape and function, the Kia Stinger - the latter being the source of irony (and the only comparison that I shall present here.)

First a "status" report: Several days ago, I had made my decision(s) - a choice to be made between a well specced 2021 base (Carmine red with body-colored side blades) on a dealers floor or ordering one of two similarly colored but different '02's. Then, quite by accident, I happened on the "Battery Replacement" thread. I had made my peace with various aspects of the Macan purchase - limited and expensive options, probable high maintenance costs and the "Porsche Tax" in general. As I read the description of the complexity of the process, the need for an expensive scanning tool and data input (why does the car need to know, in addition to functional specs, what a new battery serial number is?) I was becoming more and more uncomfortable, not with my choice of car, but with my choice of company. The warning in the warranty book demanding that a trickle charger be connected if the car is undriven for several days was the last straw. One has the option, of course, of paying the dealer $700 to replace a $200 battery. My view of Porsche as a company is expressed in this imaginary dialog:

Interviewer to senior Porsche exec: "Why does Porsche treat its customers so cavalierly?"

Response (delivered with a cold smile): "Because we can"

It's a pity - loved the Macan - best drive of the lot (OK the Panamera equalled it) but I just don't want to do business with the company.

The promised comparison: Stinger GT2 Seats - not as well finished as the Macan but equally comfortable - interior fit and finish - good but, again not to Porsche standards - electronics/instruments - a toss up. I much prefer the Macan instrument cluster but the Kia offers some unique and useful functions - radio, connectivity etc; don't know, not important to me. Appearance - the Macan does a very good job of not looking to much like an SUV but the Stinger shares the very sleek 4 door fastback shape with the A7 and Panamera. On the road the Macan wins but not by a landslide - the difference is not so much "what" as "how" The Porsche is so competent that it goes about its business almost unnoticed while the Stinger, keeping up turn for turn, exhibits a bit more of a "let me show you what I can do" demeanor. It is, in the end, rather a comparison of sophistication vs versatility, like a comparison of Fred Astaire and Frank Sinatra.

For those interested in the Kia value proposition, I've attached a copy of a 2022 GT2 Monroney sticker.

Font Material property Parallel Screenshot Pattern


"Shields up, Mr. Sulu"
See less See more
For those interested in the Kia value proposition, I've attached a copy of a 2022 GT2 Monroney sticker.



"Shields up, Mr. Sulu"
I just dont think there are many people comparison shopping a kia stinger and a macan.

However i will say as a brand new owner who just discovered the deal with the battery, like you i am very turned off by the whole deal. I would like to say something like "yeah it is annoying but a battery will last ~5 years so I'll only have to worry about it once or twice". But the apparent fact is I do need to worry about it on a daily basis because my car will only be driven a few times a week and even less in winter. After taking delivery of my car it sat for about 5 days, sure enough when I got in The car was complaining about low battery. Oye. Thankfully it started, though a bit reluctantly. In the thread you speak of there are a handful of owners that indicate it is just standard everyday practice for them to get out of the car and hook up their car to a charger. I sincerely hope those are examples of enthusiasts going a little overboard and not actually necessary. If I wanted to plug in my car I would have bought a Tesla.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I just dont think there are many people comparison shopping a kia stinger and a macan.

However i will say as a brand new owner who just discovered the deal with the battery, like you i am very turned off by the whole deal. I would like to say something like "yeah it is annoying but a battery will last ~5 years so I'll only have to worry about it once or twice". But the apparent fact is I do need to worry about it on a daily basis because my car will only be driven a few times a week and even less in winter. After taking delivery of my car it sat for about 5 days, sure enough when I got in The car was complaining about low battery. Oye. Thankfully it started, though a bit reluctantly. In the thread you speak of there are a handful of owners that indicate it is just standard everyday practice for them to get out of the car and hook up their car to a charger. I sincerely hope those are examples of enthusiasts going a little overboard and not actually necessary. If I wanted to plug in my car I would have bought a Tesla.
This is exactly my situation - retired, living alone in an apartment complex (with no way to plug in a trickle charger) and, most of the time, driving only 2-3 times or less a week. I am currently investigating another car on my list, the Audi A7, to see if this corporate sibling might be a bit more user friendly.
I usually just drive my Macan once a week or less. Just drive it for at least 30 mins on the freeway to fully charge the battery so you don’t need to hook it up with a battery tender every day. I didn’t and my original battery is still going after 6.5 years and 43k miles.

You can use a battery tender to charge your battery once a month to make sure it’s fully charged. That’s what I did after 5 years when the original battery became old.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
This is exactly my situation - retired, living alone in an apartment complex (with no way to plug in a trickle charger) and, most of the time, driving only 2-3 times or less a week. I am currently investigating another car on my list, the Audi A7, to see if this corporate sibling might be a bit more user friendly.
A simple solution in your case might be to get one of those portable power packs and use to feed a trickle charger in the trunk. Maybe you could get away with charging the power pack only once a week. Might have to do some amp hour calculations to see how long a charge would last.
I just dont think there are many people comparison shopping a kia stinger and a macan.

However i will say as a brand new owner who just discovered the deal with the battery, like you i am very turned off by the whole deal. I would like to say something like "yeah it is annoying but a battery will last ~5 years so I'll only have to worry about it once or twice". But the apparent fact is I do need to worry about it on a daily basis because my car will only be driven a few times a week and even less in winter. After taking delivery of my car it sat for about 5 days, sure enough when I got in The car was complaining about low battery. Oye. Thankfully it started, though a bit reluctantly. In the thread you speak of there are a handful of owners that indicate it is just standard everyday practice for them to get out of the car and hook up their car to a charger. I sincerely hope those are examples of enthusiasts going a little overboard and not actually necessary. If I wanted to plug in my car I would have bought a Tesla.
I'm one of those guys that hooks up my CTEK anytime the car will be sitting overnight. I got the CETK shortly after my initial purchase and started getting low battery warnings. I've learned the value of trickle chargers with my motorcycle which can sit for months without use. Even have a trickle charger on a battery for a generator. I also run all my small IC equipment (generator, lawn mower, snow blower, etc) around every solstice (3/21 6/22, 9/22 and 12/22) for 10-15 minutes, so maybe I'm OCD rather than an enthusiast. My understanding is that the issue with Porsche is the use of AGM batteries (and their charging fussiness) rather than standard batteries. I think that AGM batteries originally developed for fighter jets as ordinary batteries do not handle being inverted very well. I've never inverted my Macan and hope not to but Maybe Porsche was thinking that the higher G-force their vehicles might be exposed to deserve AGM batteries.
See less See more
Maybe next time, I mean I'm sure Consumer Reports and me are looking at things in exactly the same way. Right. Sorry to bring the bad news.

Thanks for posting this; a good read. However, what this article misses is most people don't "dream" about driving a Kia. There's no brute metal soul in a Kia. Having a Macan is really about the pure satisfaction of having one. Most people don't open the garage door to gaze at a Kia. IMO it's misleading to put a Kia and Porsche in the same sentence - they are totally different classes of driver and handling precision along with expense...I think I could have purchased 3 loaded Kia's for the price of my GTS (ok, maybe I'm a fool?) lol . But seriously, Kia is about utility, Porsche, passion. The Macan itself may be tiny, impractical and arguably dated. But even if I lose money on my 2022 GTS, it still feels like a solid investment! Macan's, especially GTS, provide a guy like me a faint glow of achievement; as sense that the suburbs may not be my only destiny! Can't say that about Kia. :ROFLMAO:
See less See more
Correction: solid investment = pure enjoyment. ;)
Thanks for posting this; a good read. However, what this article misses is most people don't "dream" about driving a Kia. There's no brute metal soul in a Kia. Having a Macan is really about the pure satisfaction of having one. Most people don't open the garage door to gaze at a Kia. IMO it's misleading to put a Kia and Porsche in the same sentence - they are totally different classes of driver and handling precision along with expense...I think I could have purchased 3 loaded Kia's for the price of my GTS (ok, maybe I'm a fool?) lol . But seriously, Kia is about utility, Porsche, passion. The Macan itself may be tiny, impractical and arguably dated. But even if I lose money on my 2022 GTS, it still feels like a solid investment! Macan's, especially GTS, provide a guy like me a faint glow of achievement; as sense that the suburbs may not be my only destiny! Can't say that about Kia. :ROFLMAO:
100% on that. Pure joy every time I start up my Turbo and hear that exhaust burble or take an exit ramp at a way to fast speed or hit that Sport+ button just to do some passing on the highway or a dozen other situations just driving it.
Thanks for posting this; a good read. However, what this article misses is most people don't "dream" about driving a Kia. There's no brute metal soul in a Kia. Having a Macan is really about the pure satisfaction of having one. Most people don't open the garage door to gaze at a Kia. IMO it's misleading to put a Kia and Porsche in the same sentence - they are totally different classes of driver and handling precision along with expense...I think I could have purchased 3 loaded Kia's for the price of my GTS (ok, maybe I'm a fool?) lol . But seriously, Kia is about utility, Porsche, passion. The Macan itself may be tiny, impractical and arguably dated. But even if I lose money on my 2022 GTS, it still feels like a solid investment! Macan's, especially GTS, provide a guy like me a faint glow of achievement; as sense that the suburbs may not be my only destiny! Can't say that about Kia. :ROFLMAO:
I beg to disagree: The Kia Stinger, based on form, function and footprint, is aimed directly at the Panamera and Audi A7. Did they hit the mark? - A matter of opinion (mine is that they missed, but not by much) Remember that Porsche, with the exception of the Cisitalia GP car, began as essentially a "chopped and channeled" VW - everybody starts somewhere.
41 - 60 of 81 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top